Read it all. Liberals have been about hating what is good for a very, very long time. They hate babies and children, they hate authentic religious faith, they hate traditional marriage, they hate economic prosperity. And they hate, they hate, they hate the people who stand in their way as they try to destroy these things.
I remember when liberals sported on their automobiles bumper stickers reading, “Hatred is not a Family Value.” Then, back in 2003, in The New Republic, Jonathan Chait wrote an essay explaining why it was legitimate to hate George W. Bush, and the dam burst. Civility is no longer a liberal ideal. And now – as yesterday’s armed attack on the Family Research Council in Washington, the five-hour delay in President Obama’s condemnation of the act as he calculated whether it was in his interest to comment or not, and the mainstream media’s initial reluctance to report on the event, much less highlight the activist LGBT connections of the shooter suggest – left liberals are willing to wink at violence. It may be regrettable, they think, but, like stealing elections, it is all in a good cause – and before figuring out how to respond to an outbreak of violence on the part of their allies, they pause to calculate the political consequences. You will not hear liberals arguing for a crackdown on the use of force by animal-rights activists, environmental activists, union thugs, and the Occupy movement. [Emphasis added.]
Alicia Silverstone as Batgirl in "Batman & Robin"
Monday, August 20, 2012
How Hatred Became a Liberal Value
Paul Rahe explains (H/T: Dyspepsia Generation):